Journal
MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 828-846Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mas.20042
Keywords
phosphoproteomics; mass spectrometry; proteomics; protein chemistry; phosphoproteins; osteopontin; bone sialoprotein
Categories
Funding
- NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG 17969] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The general fields of biological sciences have seen phenomenal transformations in the past two decades at the level of data acquisition, understanding biological processes, and technological developments. Those advances have been made partly because of the advent of molecular biology techniques (which led to genomics) coupled to the advances made in mass spectrometry (MS) to provide the current capabilities and developments in proteomics. However our current knowledge that similar to 30,000 human genes may code for up to I million or more proteins disengage the interface between the genome sequence database algorithms and MS to generate a major interest in independent de novo MS/MS sequence determination. Significant progress has been made in this area through procedures to covalently modify peptide N- and C-terminal amino-acids by sulfonation and guanidination to permit rapid de novo sequence determination by MS/MS analysis. A number of strategies that have been developed to perform qualitative and quantitative proteomics range from 2D-gel electrophoresis, affinity tag reagents, and stable-isotope labeling. Those procedures, combined with MS/MS peptide sequence analysis at the subpicomole level, permit the rapid and effective identification and quantification of a large number of proteins within a given biological sample. The identification of proteins per se, however is not always sufficient to interpret biological function because many of the naturally occurring proteins are post-translationally modified. One such modification is protein phosphorylation, which regulates a large array of cellular biochemical pathways of the biological system. Traditionally, the study of phosphoprotein structure-function relationships involved classical protein chemistry approaches that required protein purification, peptide mapping, and the identification of the phosphorylated peptide regions and sites by N-terminal sequence analysis. Recent advances made in mass spectrometry have clearly revolutionized the studies of phosphoprotein biochemistry, and include the development of specific strategies to preferentially enrich phosphoproteins by covalent-modifications that incorporate affinity tags that use the physicochemical properties of phosphoaminoacids. The phosphoserine/phosphothreonine-containing proteins/peptides are derivatized under base-catalyzed conditions by thiol agents; mono- and di-thiol reagents both have been used in such studies. The thiol agent may have: (i) an affinity tag for protein enrichment; (ii) stable-isotopic variants for relative quantitation; or (iii) a combination of the moieties in (i) and (ii). These strategies and techniques, together with others, are reviewed, including their practical application to the study of phosphoprotein biochemistry and structure-function. The consensus of how classical protein chemistry and current MS technology overlap into special case of proteomics, namely phosphoproteomics, will be discussed. (c) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available