4.6 Article

Impaired trafficking of mutants of lysosomal glucocerebrosidase in Gaucher's disease

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 2310-2320

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2005.05.008

Keywords

Gaucher's disease; glucocerbrosidase; lysosomes; mutant phenotypes; biosynthesis and processing; intracellular protein transport

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gaucher's disease is the most inherited lysosomal storage disorder. Except for a few cases, the broad phenotypic heterogeneity of Gaucher's disease can be neither predicted from defined mutations nor from differences in residual enzyme activity. Here, we analyse the intracellular trafficking of glucocerebrosidase as an underlying mechanism for the expression of the clinical phenotype. Biosynthetic labeling studies combined with immunofluorescence analyses with fibroblasts from patients with the defined mutations N370S, L444P, D409H and G202R unequivocally demonstrate a retarded transport of glucocerebrosidase carrying the mutation N370S and a transport block in the ER of the enzyme with the mutations G202R, L444P and D409H. We asked whether cellular components in the patients' fibroblasts other than glucocerebrosidase are implicated in the onset of the disease. For this, mutant cDNA's corresponding to the phenotypes N370S, G202R and L444P were expressed in the mouse fibroblasts NIH3T3. Essentially similar biochemical and cellular features were revealed as compared to the patients' fibroblasts strongly suggesting that these mutations are exclusively responsible for the characterized phenotypes. Interestingly, the immunoglobulin binding protein (BiP) binds wild type and the mutant N370S but not the G202R and L444P variants suggesting a discriminatory role played by this chaperone associated with the severity of the disease. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available