4.7 Article

Association among individual deprivation, glycemic control and diabetes complications -: The EPICES score

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 2680-2685

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2680

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - Previous studies have related poor glycemic control and/or some diabetes complications to low socioeconomic status. Some aspects of socioeconomic status have not been assessed in these studies. In the present study, we used an individual index of deprivation, the Evaluation de la Precarite et des Inegalites de sante dans les Centres d'Examens de Sante (Evaluation of Precarity and Inequalities in Health Examination Centers [EPICES]) score, to determine the relationship among glycemic control, diabetes complications, and individual conditions of deprivation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - we conducted a cross-sectional prevalence study in 135 consecutive diabetic patients (age 59.41 +/- 13.2 years [mean - SD]) admitted in the hospitalization unit of a French endocrine department. Individual deprivation was assessed by the EPICES score, calculated from 11 socioeconomic questions. Glycerine control, lipid levels, blood pressure, retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy were assessed. RESULTS - HbA(1c) level was significantly correlated with the EPICES score (r = 0.366, P < 0.001). The more deprived patients were more likely than the less deprived patients to have poor glycemic control (beta = 1.984 [SE 0.477], P < 0.001), neuropathy (odds ratio 2.39 [95% CI 1.05 - 5.43], P = 0.037), retinopathy (3.66 [1.39 - 9.64], P = 0.009), and being less often admitted for 1-day hospitalization (0.32 [0.14 - 0.74], P = 0.008). No significant relationship was observed with either nephropathy or cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS - Deprivation status is associated with poor metabolic control and more frequent microvascular complications, i.e., retinopathy and neuropathy. The medical and economic burden of deprived patients is high.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available