4.7 Article

The implication of somatotroph adenoma phenotype to somatostatin analog responsiveness in acromegaly

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 90, Issue 11, Pages 6290-6295

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2005-0998

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Persistently elevated GH and IGF-I levels are associated with increased mortality. Their response to somatostatin analogs ( SSA) is variable. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the significance of somatotroph adenoma type on response to SSA. Design: This study was a retrospective examination of postoperatively treated acromegalic patients with the SSA octreotide. Setting: The study was performed at a university-affiliated tertiary care center. Patients: Forty patients with acromegaly were studied. Main Outcome Measures: Normalization of IGF-I levels and GH responses were the main outcome measures. Results: Univariate analysis revealed that responders were more likely to have densely granulated somatotroph adenomas ( 80% vs. 43.8%; P = 0.024), to be older ( 51.3 vs. 38.2 yr; P < 0.003), to have smaller tumors ( stage <= 3; 78.6% vs. 35.7%; P = 0.022), to have lower baseline IGF-I ( 453 vs. 716 mu g/liter; P < 0.001) and GH levels (2.7 vs. 7.8 mu g/ liter; P < 0.05), and to require a lower maximum dose of SSA ( 24 vs. 31 mg every 4 wk; P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis confirmed that a densely granulated adenoma was the strongest predictor of complete response [ adjusted odds ratio ( OR), 58.41; 95% confidence interval ( CI), 1.24 - 1000.00; P = 0.04] compared with other covariates, including older age at time of diagnosis ( OR, 1.15/ yr; 95% CI, 1.01 - 1.31; P = 0.03), and tumor stage of 3 or less ( OR, 29.77; 95% CI, 1.01 - 885.45; P < 0.05). Conclusions: Somatotroph tumor type represents a strong clinical predictor of response to SSA treatment and will help to identify patients who warrant more vigilant management of their disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available