4.7 Article

An empirical study of the typology of bulimia nervosa and its spectrum variants

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages 1563-1572

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291705006057

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH 57897-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. There is an ongoing debate about the best way to classify eating disorders. This study examined potential subtypes of bulimia nervosa. Method. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify subtypes of bulimic symptomatology, utilizing data from 234 respondents in a cohort of black and white young women (n=2054). Participants were administered gated screening questions from the Eating Disorders Examination to determine DSM-IV diagnoses of eating disorders. Results. A 3-class solution was judged best. Class 1, the 'purger subtype' (n = 116), was characterized by vomiting, the use of fasting/diet pills, and relatively little bingeing. Class 2, the 'binger subtype' (n = 97) comprised women who engaged in bingeing but minimal compensatory behaviors. Class 3, the 'binge-purger subtype' (n = 21) had relatively high rates of all symptoms. Findings of differences between the three subtypes on validator variables and differences between the three subtypes compared to non-eating disorder groups suggest validity of the three bulimic subtypes identified in our analyses. Ethnicity and class membership were associated [chi(2)(3)=21.89, p<0.0001], reflecting a greater percentage of white women than black women in Class I and a greater percentage of black women than white women in Class 2. Conclusions. LCA revealed one subtype that was similar to bulimia nervosa and two subtypes of bulimic symptomatology that did not meet criteria for bulimia nervosa yet appear to be clinically significant. Further study of the psychological correlates, course, and treatment response of these classes would be of clinical interest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available