4.4 Article

The importance of dietary composition for efficacy of iron absorption measured in a whole diet that includes rye bread fortified with ferrous fumerate: a radioisotope study in young women

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 720-726

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1079/BJN20051556

Keywords

iron deficiency; iron fortification; vitamin C; meat; phytic acid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fe absorption is affected by many dietary factors. The objective of the present study was to measure the effects of high v. low content of vitamin C, meat and phytic acid in whole diets with Fe-fortified bread on the efficacy of Fe absorption. Thirty-two healthy women with low Fe stores were randomised to three groups, each of which was given two of six test diets containing either low/high amounts of vitamin C, meat or phytic acid, respectively, in a cross-over design. Each diet was served throughout a 5 d period. Fe-fortified rye bread, extrinsically labelled with Fe-59, was given with all main meals. Fe absorption was determined from whole-body counter measurements of Fe-59 retention. The fractional non-haem Fe absorption (corrected to a 40 % standard absorption by measurements from the reference dose) was 1.9% v. 3.4% (P=0.04) for the low/high vitamin C diets, 3.0% v. 3.5% (P=0.58) on the low/high meat diets and 4.9% v. 3.8% (P=0.24) on the low/high phytic acid diet, respectively. The total Fe absorbed (geometric mean with standard error) varied from 0.43 (se 0.11) mg from the diet with lowest bioavailability to 1.09 (se 0.18) mg from the diet with highest bioavailability (P < 0.001). The present whole-diet study indicates that diet composition is a strong predictor of Fe absorption. In the diet with a low content of enhancers and a high content of inhibitors, vitamin C improved non-haem Fe absorption. The total Fe absorption varied 2.5-fold after small alterations of the content of enhancers and inhibitors in the diet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available