4.6 Article

Chimerism, Graft Survival, and Withdrawal of Immunosuppressive Drugs in HLA Matched and Mismatched Patients After Living Donor Kidney and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 695-704

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13091

Keywords

clinical research; practice; translational research; science; kidney transplantation; nephrology; bone marrow; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; tolerance: chimerism; tolerance: clinical

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [PO1HL075462, RO1 AI1085024]
  2. Stanford Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection
  3. Goldman
  4. Sobrato
  5. Moore Foundations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thirty-eight HLA matched and mismatched patients given combined living donor kidney and enriched CD34(+) hematopoietic cell transplants were enrolled in tolerance protocols using posttransplant conditioning with total lymphoid irradiation and anti-thymocyte globulin. Persistent chimerism for at least 6 months was associated with successful complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive drugs in 16 of 22 matched patients without rejection episodes or kidney disease recurrence with up to 5 years follow up thereafter. One patient is in the midst of withdrawal and five are on maintenance drugs. Persistent mixed chimerism was achieved in some haplotype matched patients for at least 12 months by increasing the dose of T cells and CD34(+) cells infused as compared to matched recipients in a dose escalation study. Success of drug withdrawal in chimeric mismatched patients remains to be determined. None of the 38 patients had kidney graft loss or graft versus host disease with up to 14 years of observation. In conclusion, complete immunosuppressive drug withdrawal could be achieved thus far with the tolerance induction regimen in HLA matched patients with uniform long-term graft survival in all patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available