4.3 Article

Treadmill walking and overground walking of human subjects compared by recording sole-floor reaction force

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 343-348

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2005.08.005

Keywords

treadmill walking; overground walking; sole-floor reaction force; human locomotion

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to clarify differences of treadmill from overground locomotion, experiments were carried out on 10 volunteers (five males and five females). Sole-floor reaction force was recorded from five anatomically discrete points with strain gauge transducers of 14 turn diameter attached firmly to the sole of bare-foot. At first the subject was asked to walk on the laboratory floor at his/her preferred velocity. After the average velocity was obtained, the subject was asked to walk on the treadmill at the same velocity of average overground walking. Stance period at treadmill walking shortened to 93.3% (P < 0.01) of the value at overground walking. Coefficient of variation of stance period was significantly smaller at the treadmill walking than at overground walking. Strain gauge-floor contact times were shorter in the treadmill walking; heel 81.2%, first metatarsal 93.5%, third metatarsal 93.6%, fifth metatarsal 90.6%and at great toe 93.2% of overground locomotion. Cadence during treadmill locomotion was significantly larger than overground walking (106.6%, P < 0.05). These results show that when subjects walk on the treadmill and on laboratory floor at the identical speed, stance period shortened by 6.7% while cadence increased by 6.6% on the treadmill. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available