4.7 Article

Electrophysiological properties of pluripotent human and mouse embryonic stem cells

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 1526-1534

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0299

Keywords

embryonic stem cells; electrophysiology; pluripotency; ion channels

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL072857-01A2, R01 HL-52768, R01 HL-72857] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) possess promising potential for cell-based therapies, but their electrophysiological properties have not been characterized. Here we describe the presence of ionic currents in mouse (m) and human (h) ESCs and their physiological function. In mESCs, tetraethylammonium (TEA)-sensitive depolarization-activated delayed rectifier K+ currents (IKDR) (8.6 +/- 0.9 pA/pF at + 40 mV; IC50 = 1.2 +/- 0.3 mM), which contained components sensitive to 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) (IC50 = 0.5 +/- 0.1 mM) and 100 nM Ca2+ -activated K+ current (IKCa) blocker iberiotoxin (IBTX), were detected in 52.3% of undifferentiated cells. IKDR was similarly present in hESCs (similar to 100%) but with an approximately sixfold higher current density (47.5 +/- 7.9 pA/pF at + 40 mV). When assayed by bromodeoxyurindine incorporation, application of TEA, 4-AP, or IBTX significantly reduced the proliferation of mESCs and hESCs in a dose-dependent manner (p <.05). A hyperpolarization-activated inward current (I-h) (-2.2 +/- 0.4 pA/pF at -120 mV) was detected in 23% of mESCs but not hESCs. Neither Na-v nor Ca-v currents were detected in mESCs and hESCs. Microarray and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analyses identified several candidate genes for the ionic currents discovered. Collectively, our results indicate that pluripotent ESCs functionally express several specialized ion channels and further highlight similarities and differences between the two species. Practical considerations for the therapeutic use of ESCs are discussed. STEM CELLS 2005;23:1526-1534.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available