4.5 Article

Estimates of Upper Palaeolithic meta-population size in Europe from archaeological data

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 32, Issue 11, Pages 1656-1668

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.05.006

Keywords

Upper Palaeolithic demography; refuge zones; space-time density of archaeological sites; palaeodemography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three databases (2961 georeferenced archeological sites, simulated climatic variables simulating a typical warm phase of the isotopic stage 3 (IOS3 project), and ethnographic of hunter-gatherers (HG)) were used to estimate the size, growth rate and kinetics of the metapopulation of HG during four periods of the Upper Paleolithic in Europe. The size of the metapopulation was obtained by multiplying a demographic density (per 100 km(2)) by the size of the population territory of HG. Demographic density for each period was calculated by successively backprojecting a reference density obtained for the Late Glacial with inter-period growth rate of the archeological sites. From the Aurignacian to the Glacial Maximum, the metapopulation remained in a positive quasistationary state, with about 4400-5900 inhabitants (95% confidence interval (CI95%): 1700-37,700 inhabitants). During the Glacial Maximum, the metapopulation responded to the cold: (i) by moving the northern limits of its maximum expansion zone towards the low latitudes by 150-500 km from west to east, (ii) by concentrating in few refuge zones (mainly Perigord, Cantabria and the Iberian coasts), (iii) by becoming perhaps distributed in smaller groups than during the pre and post Glacial Maximum. The metapopulation reached 28,800 inhabitants (CI95%: 11,300-72,600) during the mid-Late Glacial recolonisation. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available