4.0 Article

Diversity of toxin and non-toxin containing cyanobacterial mats of meltwater ponds on the Antarctic Peninsula: a pyrosequencing approach

Journal

ANTARCTIC SCIENCE
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 521-532

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954102014000145

Keywords

automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis; cylindrospermopsin; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; microcystin

Funding

  1. Carl Zeiss Stiftung
  2. Excellence Initiative of the University of Konstanz, Germany
  3. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  4. British Antarctic Survey (BAS) [AFI-CGS-70]
  5. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite their pivotal role as primary producers, there is little information as to the diversity and physiology of cyanobacteria in the meltwater ecosystems of polar regions. Thirty cyanobacterial mats from Adelaide Island, Antarctica were investigated using 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis, and screened for cyanobacterial toxins using molecular and chemical approaches. A total of 274 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were detected. The richness ranged between 8 and 33 cyanobacterial OTUs per sample, reflecting a high mat diversity. Leptolyngbya and Phormidium (c. 55% and 37% of the OTUs per mat) were dominant. Cyanobacterial community composition was similar between mats, particularly those obtained from closely adjacent locations. The cyanotoxin microcystin was detected in 26 of 27 mats (10-300 ng g(-1) organic mass), while cylindrospermopsin, detected for the first time in Antarctica, was present in 21 of 30 mats (2-156 ng g(-1) organic mass). The latter was confirmed via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and by the presence of the cyrAB and cyrJ genes. This study demonstrates the usefulness of pyrosequencing for characterizing diverse cyanobacterial communities, and confirms that cyanobacteria from extreme environments produce a similar range of cyanotoxins as their temperate counterparts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available