4.3 Article

Motion- and orientation-specific cortical responses in infancy

Journal

VISION RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 25-26, Pages 3169-3179

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.021

Keywords

visual evoked potentials; motion; orientation; visual development; infant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the first 3 months, infants develop visual evoked potential (VEP) responses that are signatures of cortical orientation-selectivity and directional motion selectivity (Braddick, O. J., Wattam-Bell, J., & Atkinson, J. (1986). Orientation-specific cortical responses develop in early infancy. Nature, London, 320, 617-619; Wattam-Bell, J. (1991). Development of motion-specific cortical responses in infancy. Vision Research, 31, 287-297). This study compared these responses directly in the same infants, to investigate whether the later appearance of direction selectivity was intrinsic, or a function of the spatio-temporal characteristics of the stimuli used. Steady-state orientation-reversal (OR-) VEPs and direction-reversal (DR-) VEPs were recorded in infants aged 4-18 weeks. DR-VEPs were elicited with random pixel patterns and with gratings spatially similar to those used for OR-VEPs, at velocities of 5.5 and I I deg/s, and reversal rates of 2 and 4 reversals/s. Infants throughout the age range showed significant responses to orientation-reversal. Direction-reversal responses appeared in less than 25% of infants under 7 weeks of age, rising to 80% or more at 11-13 weeks, whether tested with dots or gratings and for both speeds and reversal rates. However, 2 reversals/s elicits the DR-VEP on average about 2 weeks earlier than 4 reversal/s stimulation. We conclude that human cortical direction selectivity develops separately from orientation-selectivity and emerges at a later age, even with tests that are designed to optimise the former. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available