4.5 Article

Evaluation of Hofmeister effects on the kinetic stability of proteins

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 109, Issue 43, Pages 20612-20619

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp053618+

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dissolved salts are known to affect properties of proteins in solution including solubility and melting temperature, and the effects of dissolved salts can be ranked qualitatively by the Hofmeister series. We seek a quantitative model to predict the effects of salts in the Hofmeister series on the deactivation kinetics of enzymes. Such a model would allow for a better prediction of useful biocatalyst lifetimes or an improved estimation of protein-based pharmaceutical shelf life. Here we consider a number of salt properties that are proposed indicators of Hofmeister effects in the literature as a means for predicting salt effects on the deactivation of horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase (HL-ADH), alpha-chymotrypsin, and monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP). We find that surface tension increments are not accurate predictors of salt effects but find a common trend between observed deactivation constants and B-viscosity coefficients of the Jones-Dole equation, which are indicative of ion hydration. This trend suggests that deactivation constants (log k(d,obs)) vary linearly with chaotropic B-viscosity coefficients but are relatively unchanged in kosmotropic solutions. The invariance with kosmotropic B-viscosity coefficients suggests the existence of a minimum deactivation constant for proteins. Differential scanning calorimetry is used to measure protein melting temperatures and thermodynamic parameters, which are used to calculate the intrinsic irreversible deactivation constant. We find that either the protein unfolding rate or the rate of intrinsic irreversible deactivation can control the observed deactivation rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available