4.6 Article

Prevalence of gallstone disease in first-degree relatives of patients with cholelithiasis

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 41, Pages 6508-6511

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBL GRP CO LTD
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i41.6508

Keywords

Gallstones; Familiality

Funding

  1. SANOFI-Synthelabo SpA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To evaluate the influence of familiality on the prevalence of gallstone disease (GD) in Italy. METHODS: Families of 79 subjects with gallstones (cases) and of 79 subjects without gallstones (controls) were investigated for the presence of gallstones by ultrasonography. Index cases and index controls were matched for age, sex, and operative unit. Sixty-three and sixty-two husbands and wives of index cases and index controls, respectively, were also studied. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of GD was significantly higher (chi(2) = 14.52, P < 0.001) in the 202 first-degree relatives of subjects with gallstones than that in the 201 first-degree relatives of subjects without gallstones (28.6% vs 12.4%, relative risk (RR) 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-2.63). In particular, prevalence of GD was significantly higher in mothers, fathers, and sisters of index cases than that in the respective family members of index controls. The highest RR was observed in mothers (RR=2.35, 95% CI 1.38-4.3). Prevalence of GD was not obviously different in brothers and also in husbands and wives of index cases and index controls. Family members of index cases did not differ from family members of control cases with respect to the most important risk factors for gallstones (age, diabetes, BMI, and number of pregnancies) with an exception of a higher prevalence of diabetes in fathers of index controls than in fathers of index cases. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that familiality plays a very important role in the pathogenesis of gallstones. (C) 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available