4.5 Review Book Chapter

Protective interventions to prevent aflatoxin-induced carcinogenesis in developing countries

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 187-203

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090859

Keywords

prevention; liver cancer; biomarkers

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 39416] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P01 ES 006052, P30 ES 003819] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA039416] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P30ES003819, P01ES006052] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The public health impact of aflatoxin exposure is pervasive in economically developing countries; consequently, we need to design intervention strategies for prevention that are practicable for these high-risk populations. The adverse health consequences of aflatoxins in populations are quite varied, eliciting acute effects, such as rapid death, and chronic outcomes, such as hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, a number of epidemiological studies describe a variety of general adverse health effects associated with aflatoxin, such as impaired growth in children. Thus, the magnitude of the problem is disseminated across the entire spectrum of age, gender, and health status in the population. The aflatoxins multiplicatively increase the risk of liver cancer in people chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), which illustrates the deleterious impact that even low toxin levels in the diet can pose for human health. Thus other aflatoxin interactions, which likely contribute to the diesease burden, still remain to be identified. Therefore, many diverse and appropriate strategies for disease prevention are needed to decrease the incidence of aflatoxin carcinogenesis in developing countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available