4.6 Review Book Chapter

Mindful judgment and Decision Making

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 53-85

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163633

Keywords

choice; preference; inference; cognition; emotion; attention; memory; learning; process models

Funding

  1. Russell Sage Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation [SES-0352062]
  3. National Institute of Aging [R01AGO27931-01A2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A hill range of psychological processes has been put into play to explain judgment and choice phenomena. Complementing work on attention, information integration, and learning, decision research over the past 10 years has also examined the effects of goals, mental representation, and memory processes. In addition to deliberative processes, automatic processes have gotten closer attention, and the emotions revolution has put affective processes on a footing equal to cognitive ones. Psychological process models provide natural predictions about individual differences and Hespan changes and integrate across judgment and decision making (JDM) phenomena. Mindful JDM research leverages our knowledge about psychological processes into causal explanations for important judgment and choice regularities, emphasizing the adaptive use of an abundance of processing alternatives. Such explanations supplement and support existing mathematical descriptions of phenomena such as loss aversion or hyperbolic discounting. Unlike such descriptions, they. also provide entry points for interventions designed to help people overcome judgments or choices considered undesirable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available