4.6 Article

Contrasting effects of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 deficiency on the host response to influenza A viral infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 10, Pages 6878-6884

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6878

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Influenza is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide despite extensive research and vaccine availability. The cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway is important in modulating immune responses and is also a major target of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the newer COX-2 inhibitors. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of deficiency of COX-1 or COX-2 on the host response to influenza. We used an influenza A viral infection model in wild type (WT), COX-1(-/-), and COX-2(-/-) mice. Infection induced less severe illness in COX-2(-/-) mice in comparison to WT and COX-1(-/-) mice as evidenced by body weight and body temperature changes. Mortality was significantly reduced in COX-2(-/-) mice. COX-1(-/-) mice had enhanced inflammation and earlier appearance of proinflammatory cytokines in the BAL fluid, whereas the inflammatory and cytokine responses were blunted in COX-2(-/-) mice. However, lung viral titers were markedly elevated in COX-2(-/-) mice relative to WT and COX-1(-/-) mice on day 4 of infection. Levels of PGE(2) were reduced in COX-1(-/-) airways whereas cysteinyl leukotrienes were elevated in COX-2(-/-) airways following infection. Thus, deficiency of COX-1 and COX-2 leads to contrasting effects in the host response to influenza infection, and these differences are associated with altered production of prostaglandins and leukotrienes following infection. COX-1 deficiency is detrimental whereas COX-2 deficiency is beneficial to the host during influenza viral infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available