4.7 Article

Results of a randomized controlled Trial to increase Colorectal cancer screening in a managed care health plan

Journal

CANCER
Volume 104, Issue 10, Pages 2072-2083

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21434

Keywords

quality improvement; randomized clinical trial; provider organizations; colorectal cancer screening; managed care

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA75544] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer deaths; however, rates Of regular screening for this cancer are low. A quality improvement (QI) program to increase CRC screening was developed for use in a managed care health plan. METHODS. Thirty-six provider organizations (POs) contracting with the health plan were recruited for a randomized controlled effectiveness trial testing the QI program. The intervention was delivered over a 2-year period, and its effectiveness was assessed by chart review of a random sample of patients from each PO. RESULTS. Thirty-two of the 36 POs were evaluable for outcome assessment. During the 2-year intervention period, only 26% of the eligible patients received any CRC screening test. Twenty-nine percent of patients had any CRC screening test within guidelines, with no differences between the intervention or control POs. Significant predictors of having received CRC screening within guidelines were older age (P = 0.0004), receiving care in an integrated medical group (P < 0.0001) and having had a physical examination within the past 2 years (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS. A facilitated QI intervention program for CRC screening that focused on the PO did not increase rates of CRC screening. Overall CRC screening rates are low and are in need of improvement. (c) 2005 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available