4.6 Article

The mechanism of superantigen-mediated toxic shock: Not a simple Th1 cytokine storm

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 10, Pages 6870-6877

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6870

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The profound clinical consequences of Gram-positive toxic shock are hypothesized to stem from excessive Th1 responses to superantigens. We used a new superantigen-sensitive transgenic model to explore the role of TCR alpha beta T cells in responses to staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) in vitro and in two different in vivo models. The proliferative and cytokine responses of HLA-DR1 spleen cells were 100-fold more sensitive than controls and were entirely dependent on TCR alpha beta T cells. HLA-DR1 mice showed greater sensitivity in vivo to two doses of SEB with higher mortality and serum cytokines; than controls. When D-galactosamine was used as a sensitizing agent with a single dose of SEB, HLA-DR1 mice died of toxic shock whereas controls did not. In this sensitized model of toxic shock there was a biphasic release of cytokines, including TNF-alpha, at 2 h and before death at 7 h. In both models, mortality and cytokine release at both time points were dependent on TCR alpha beta T cells. Anti-TNF-alpha pretreatment was protective against shock whereas anti-IFN gamma pretreatment and delayed anti-TNF-alpha treatment were not. Importantly, anti-TNF-alpha pretreatment inhibited the early TNF-a response but did not inhibit the later TNF-alpha burst, to which mortality has previously been attributed. Splenic T cells were shown definitively to be the major source of TNF-alpha during the acute cytokine response. Our results demonstrate unequivocally that TCR alpha beta T cells are critical for lethality in toxic shock but it is the early TNF-alpha response and not the later cytokine surge that mediates lethal shock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available