4.2 Article

An Approach to Uncertain Linguistic Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Interactive Index

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218488515500130

Keywords

group decision making; uncertain linguistic variable; Choquet integral; fuzzy measure; generalized Shapley function

Funding

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [71431006]
  2. Funds for Creative Research Groups of China [71221061]
  3. Projects of Major International Cooperation NSFC [71210003]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71201089, 71271217, 71201110, 71271029]
  5. National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China [2014M560655]
  6. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China [NCET-12-0541]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, two uncertain linguistic Choquet aggregation operators called the induced uncertain linguistic hybrid generalized Shapley Choquet weighted averaging (IULHGSCWA) operator and the induced uncertain linguistic hybrid generalized Shapley Choquet geometric mean (IULHGSCGM) operator are defined. To reduce the complexity of solving a fuzzy measure, the induced uncertain linguistic hybrid 2-additive generalized Shapley Choquet weighted averaging (IULHAGSCWA) operator and the induced uncertain linguistic hybrid 2-additive generalized Shapley Choquet geometric mean (IULHAGSCGM) operator are presented. When the weight information is incompletely known, models for the optimal fuzzy measures on an expert set, on an attribute set and on their ordered sets are built, respectively. Furthermore, an approach to multi-attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment is developed, which can cope with the interdependent or correlative characteristics between elements. Finally, practical application is selected to illustrate the validity and practicability of the developed procedure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available