4.4 Article

Detailed considerations for a balanced and broadly applicable force field: A study of substituted benzenes modeled with OPLS-AA

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages 1529-1541

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20284

Keywords

free energy of hydration; generalized Born; free energy perturbation; OPLS-AA force field; substituted benzenes

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM37554] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modem classical force fields have been traditionally parameterized by attempting to maximize agreement to any number of experimental and/or quantum mechanical target properties. As these force fields are pushed towards obtaining quantitative estimates of often subtle energetic differences, stringent and consistent parameterization criteria, particularly in regard to charge distributions, are required to ensure that systematic errors cancel, that parameters are transferable between molecules, and that performance does not significantly deteriorate when using more approximate methods, such as with continuum solvent models. Relative free energies of hydration are presented here for 40 mono-and disubstituted benzenes modeled with the OPLS-AA force field; heats of vaporization and pure liquid densities at standard conditions are presented when experimental data is available. Overall agreement between OPLS-AA and experiment is remarkable (average error = 0.5 kcal/mol for Delta Delta G(hydration), 1.0 kcal/mol for Delta H-vap(o), 0.02 g/mL for densities), yet several functional groups are identified as having consistent and correctable errors (alkyl-, nitro-, and thiobenzenes). Relative free energies of hydration obtained with rigorous free energy perturbations using explicit solvent are also compared with energies from minimizations using a generalized Born model (GB). There is high correlation between these estimates (R = 0.99), and as demonstrated here, reparameterization of the aforementioned groups can be guided with rapid GB calculations. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available