4.5 Article

Kinetic studies on the interactions of heparin and complement proteins using surface plasmon resonance

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
Volume 1726, Issue 2, Pages 168-176

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.08.003

Keywords

complement; polysaccharide; interaction; SPR; heparin

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL052622, HL52622, R01 HL052622-07, R01 HL052622-08] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM038060, R01 GM038060-16A2, GM38060, R01 GM038060-17] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heparin is a naturally occurring polysaccharide known to interact with complement proteins and regulate multiple steps in the complement cascade. Quantitative information, in the form of affinity constants for heparin-complement interactions, is not generally available and there are no reports of a comprehensive analysis using the same interaction method. Such information should improve our understanding of how exogenously administered pharmaceutical heparin and the related endogenous polysaccharide, heparan sulfate, regulate complement activation. The current study provides the first comprehensively analysis of the binding of various complement proteins to heparin using surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Complement proteins Cl, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9, C1INH, factor 1, factor H, factor B and factor P all bind heparin but exhibit different binding kinetics and dissociation constants (K-d) ranging from 2 to 320 nM. By taking into account these K-d values and the serum concentrations of these complement proteins, the percentage of each binding to exogenously administered heparin was calculated and found to range from 2% to 41%. This study provides essential information required for the rational design of new therapeutic agents capable of regulating the complement activation. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available