4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The relationship between condom use and herpes simplex virus acquisition

Journal

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 143, Issue 10, Pages 707-713

Publisher

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-10-200511150-00007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-30731] Funding Source: Medline
  2. ODCDC CDC HHS [UR6/CCU017828-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Few studies have evaluated the relationship be. tween condom use and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) and HSV type 1 (HSV-1) acquisition. Objective: To assess the relationship between condom use and acquisition of HSV-2 and HSV-1 among men and women. Design: Analysis of data collected as part of a clinical trial of an ineffective candidate vaccine for HSV-2. Setting: Sexually transmitted disease clinics. Participants: Men and women at risk for HSV-2 acquisition, defined as having 4 or more sexual partners or having a sexually transmitted disease in the past year. Measurement: Acquisition of HSV-2 and HSV-1 as measured by viral culture or change to positive HSV serostatus. Results: Of 1843 participants, 118 (6.4%) became infected with HSV-2. In multivariate analyses, participants reporting more frequent use of condoms were at lower risk for acquiring HSV-2 than participants who used condoms less frequently (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% Cl, 0.59 to 0.95]); categories of increasing condom use were 0% to 25%, 25% to 75%, and greater than 75% of sexual acts. Nineteen (2.9%) of 659 participants at risk for infection with HSV-1 became infected. No statistically significant association between condom use and infection with HSV-1 was found (hazard ratio, 0.79 [Cl, 0.48 to 1.31]). Limitations: use of condoms was measured by self-report, and persons who used condoms may have differed from those who did not. Conclusions: Consistent use of condoms is associated with lower rates of infection with HSV-2 and should be routinely recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available