4.7 Article

Electrostatics of the intracellular vestibule of K+ channels

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 354, Issue 2, Pages 272-288

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.031

Keywords

KcsA; MthK; KirBac1.1; KvAP; shaker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous calculations using continuum electrostatic calculations showed that a fully hydrated monovalent cation is electrostatically stabilized at the center of the cavity of the KcsA potassium channel. Further analysis demonstrated that this cavity stabilization was controlled by a balance between the unfavorable reaction field due to the finite size of the cavity and the favorable electrostatic field arising from the pore helices. In the present study, continuum electrostatic calculations are used to investigate how the stability of an ion in the intracellular vestibular cavity common to known potassium channels is affected as the inner channel gate opens and the cavity becomes larger and contiguous with the intracellular solution. The X-ray structure of the calcium-activated potassium channel MthK, which was crystallized in the open state, is used to construct models of the KcsA channel in the open state. It is found that, as the channel opens, the barrier at the helix bundle crossing decreases to approximate to 0 kcal/mol, but that the ion in the cavity is also significantly destabilized. The results are compared and contrasted with additional calculations performed on the KvAP (voltage-activated) and KirBac1.1 (inward rectifier) channels, as well as models of the pore domain of Shaker in the open and closed state. In conclusion, electrostatic factors give rise to energetic constraints on ion permeation that have important functional consequences on the various K+ channels, and partly explain the presence or absence of charged residues near the inner vestibular entry. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available