4.4 Article

Activation of splanchnic and pelvic colonic afferents by bradykinin in mice

Journal

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 854-862

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00710.x

Keywords

afferents; B2 receptors; bradykinin; colon; pelvic; splanchnic

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 35790, NS 19912, F30 NS 46941] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Lumbar splanchnic (LSN) and sacral pelvic (PN) nerves convey different mechanosensory information from the colon to the spinal cord. Here, we determined whether these pathways differ also in their chemosensitivity to bradykinin. Methods: Using a novel in vitro mouse colon preparation, serosal afferents were recorded from the LSN and PN and distinguished based on their mechanosensitivity to von Frey filaments (70-4000 mg) and insensitivity to colonic stretch (1-5 g) or fine mucosal stroking (10 mg). Bradykinin was applied into a ring around mechanoreceptive fields. Results: The LSN and PN afferents had different dynamic responses to mechanical stimuli: PN afferents required lower intensity stimuli, evoked larger responses, and displayed more maintained responses than LSN afferents. Bradykinin (1 mu mol L-1) excited 66% (27 of 41) of LSN afferents. Responses to probing were potentiated after bradykinin. The concentration-dependent (EC50: 0.16 mu mol L-1) response was reversed by the B-2-receptor antagonist HOE-140 (10 nmol L-1). Twelve bradykinin responsive afferents were mechanically insensitive. More LSN serosal afferents responded to bradykinin than PN afferents (11%, P < 0.001), with larger responses (P < 0.05). No mechanically insensitive PN afferents were recruited by bradykinin. Conclusions: Bradykinin potently stimulates most splanchnic serosal afferents via B-2-receptors, but few pelvic afferents. Mechanically insensitive afferents recruited by bradykinin are exclusive to the LSN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available