4.6 Review Book Chapter

Recognition of Bacteria by Inflammasomes

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF IMMUNOLOGY, VOL 31
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages 73-106

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095944

Keywords

caspase; NLR; innate immunity; pyroptosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research Institute
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  3. University of California Cancer Research Coordinating Committee
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  5. National Institutes of Health Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Fellowship [AI091068]
  6. National Institutes of Health R01 grants [AI063302, AI075039, AI080749]
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI075039, R01AI080749] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inflammasomes are cytosolic multiprotein complexes that assemble in response to a variety of infectious and noxious insults. Inflammasomes play a critical role in the initiation of innate immune responses, primarily by serving as platforms for the activation of inflammatory caspase proteases. One such caspase, CASPASE-1 (CASP1), initiates innate immune responses by cleaving pro-IL-1 beta and pro-IL-18, leading to their activation and release. CASP1 and another inflammatory caspase termed CASP11 can also initiate a rapid and inflammatory form of cell death termed pyroptosis. Several distinct inflammasomes have been described, each of which contains a unique sensor protein of the NLR (nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat-containing) superfamily or the PYHIN (PYRIN and HIN-200 domain-containing) superfamily. Here we describe the surprisingly diverse mechanisms by which NLR/PYHIN proteins sense bacteria and initiate innate immune responses. We conclude that inflammasomes represent a highly adaptable scaffold ideally suited for detecting and initiating rapid innate responses to diverse and rapidly evolving bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available