4.2 Article

Path integration:: is there a difference between athletes and non-athletes?

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 167, Issue 4, Pages 670-674

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0251-3

Keywords

path length integration; self-motion perception; velocity-step length relationship; walking; athletes

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability to estimate distance walked when blindfolded is associated with the vestibular, proprioceptive and ( loco-) motor systems. In this study, we examined subjects' ability to walk when blindfolded to a previously seen target. We examined whether there is a difference of performance in path integration between athletes and non- athletes. Two groups of healthy volunteers took part in this experiment: 21 athletes and 20 non- athletes. Subjects were asked to walk at three different velocities ( slow, normal, fast) to a target ( 10 m in front of them) that they had seen before being blindfolded. Increase in velocity was associated with a decrease in the distance walked for both groups. Both groups were accurate at normal velocities. Athletes were also accurate at fast velocities whereas non- athletes undershot the target. In both groups, accuracy considerably decreased at slow velocities. It seems that our perceptual system can adapt to different velocities ( normal, fast) but is most strongly disrupted at low velocity. When attempting to modify walking velocity, step length is also modified, playing a determining role in the estimation of distance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available