4.6 Review Book Chapter

How the Fanconi Anemia Pathway Guards the Genome

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 223-249

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134222

Keywords

DNA repair; interstrand crosslink; cancer; homologous recombination; translesion synthesis; protein ubiquitination

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1DK43889, RO1HL52725, PO1DK50654, U19A1067751, 5PO1CA092584]
  2. International Human Frontiers Science Program Organization
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA092584] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL052725, R37HL052725] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U19AI067751] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P01DK050654, R01DK043889] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fanconi Anemia (FA) is an inherited genomic instability disorder, caused by mutations in genes regulating replication-dependent removal of interstrand DTNA crosslinks. The Fanconi Anemia pathway is thought to coordinate a complex mechanism that enlists elements of three classic DNA repair pathways, namely homologous recombination, nucleotide excision repair, and mutagenic translesion synthesis, in response to genotoxic insults. To this end, the Fanconi Anemia pathway employs a unique nuclear protein complex that ubiquitinates FANCD2 and FANCI, leading to formation of DNA repair structures. Lack of obvious enzymatic activities among most FA members has made it challenging to unravel its precise modus operandi. Here we review the current understanding of how the Fanconi Anemia pathway components participate in DNA repair and discuss the mechanisms that regulate this pathway to ensure timely, efficient, and correct restoration of chromosomal integrity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available