4.5 Article

Taxonomic, anatomical, and spatio-temporal variations in the stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions of plants from an African savanna

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 32, Issue 12, Pages 1757-1772

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.06.006

Keywords

palaeodiet; photosynthesis; plants; stable isotopes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable carbon (delta C-13) and nitrogen (delta N-15) isotope ratios are commonly used to reconstruct palaeodiets and palaeoenvironments. The method is based on our knowledge of isotopic patterns in plants, which are Subject to taxonomic and environmental variability. While previous researchers have addressed isotopic variability amongst plants, no studies have looked extensively at a broad suite of taxa over multiple temporal scales from within the savanna biome so as to provide baseline data for palaeodietary and palaeoenvironmental studies. Here we document variations in the isotopic compositions of plants collected over two years from the Kruger National Park, South Africa, with respect to species and anatomical differences, and the influences of geological substrate and spatio-temporal shifts in climate. Results show that environmentally-induced carbon isotopic variations in plants within this region are generally smaller than 2 parts per thousand, which is lower than what has been previously reported for plants compared across multiple habitat-types. These data suggest that delta C-13 differences of similar to 2 parts per thousand or more (or similar to 1 parts per thousand if the diet is predominantly C-4) between animals from a given area reliably indicate real dietary differences. Plant delta N-15 values vary greatly between different microhabitats (by up to 4 parts per thousand), responding to a range of environmental influences that may, in turn.. significantly influence variation in animal delta N-15 values. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available