4.7 Article

Isocoumarins as estrogen receptor beta selective ligands: Isomers of isoflavone phytoestrogens and their metabolites

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 13, Issue 23, Pages 6529-6542

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.07.014

Keywords

estrogen receptor alpha; estrogen receptor beta; isocoumarin; equol; genistein

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [5R37 CA25836, 5R01 CA19118] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 01575, 1 S10 RR104444-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG024387A] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 27029] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a search for new ligands selective for the estrogen receptor beta (ER beta), we prepared a series of non-steroidal compounds having an isocoumarin core structure. An interesting feature of these derivatives is that they bear the same functionalities as the well-known ER beta -selective, isoflavone phytoestrogens daidzein and genistein, but in an isomeric arrangement. These compounds could be prepared efficiently by electrophilic cyclization of acetylenic ester precursors, followed by simple manipulations to introduce additional substituents. Through a reduction of some of the isocoumarins, we also obtained isomeric analogs of the isoflavone metabolites equol and dehydroequol. The compounds we prepared were evaluated in ER binding assays, and selected compounds were studied further in cell-based gene transcription assays. Several of the isocoumarins and their analogs are high-affinity ligands that show considerable selectivity for ER beta in terms of binding affinity, and strikingly high ER beta selectivity in terms of potency in gene transcription assays. Two of the best compounds, which combine high transcriptional potency with an ER beta selectivity greater than 1000, should prove to be excellent probes of ER beta function in vivo. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available