4.6 Article

Changes in brain activity following sacral neuromodulation for urinary retention

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 6, Pages 2268-2272

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181806.59363.d1

Keywords

brain stem; diagnostic imaging; neurotransmitters; urinary retention

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Sacral nerve stimulation (neuromodulation) can restore bladder sensation and the ability to void in women with urinary retention due to sphincter overactivity (Fowler's syndrome). Modulation of central afferent activity is considered critical to this therapeutic effect but the neural mechanisms are poorly understood. Therefore, we undertook a functional brain imaging study to determine how neuromodulation acts on brain centers involved in the representation and control of bladder function. Materials and Methods: Eight patients with Fowler's syndrome and 8 healthy controls underwent brain imaging with positron emission tomography to identify regions of brain activity relating to the perception of bladder fullness and their modulation by sacral nerve stimulation. Results: In healthy controls bladder fullness enhanced activity in brainstem (midbrain) and limbic cortical regions. Women with urinary retention showed no significant brainstem activity but did show enhanced limbic cortical activity when the bladder was full in the absence of neuromodulation. Neuromodulation restored a normal pattern of midbrain activity and decreased cortical activity in this group. Conclusions: Our study provides novel neuroimaging evidence for the existence of abnormal interaction between brainstem and cortical centers in women with urinary retention. Furthermore, we have been able to show evidence that the therapeutic effect of sacral neuromodulation is achieved through restoration of activity associated with brainstem autoregulation and attenuation of cingulate activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available