4.6 Article

Neonatal meningitis in England and Wales: sequelae at 5 years of age

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 164, Issue 12, Pages 730-734

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-005-1747-3

Keywords

disability; follow-up; meningitis; national study; neonatal

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study determined the prevalence of serious sequelae among a national cohort of 5-year old children, born in England and Wales in 1996-7, who had had neonatal meningitis. The results were compared with those from two matched control groups. In addition the results from this study were compared with those from a previous 5-year follow-up of children who had had neonatal meningitis in 1985-7. Follow-up questionnaires requesting information about the children's health and development were sent to the general practitioners (GPs) and parents of the index children and controls. Information was collected on 166 of 232 (72%) children who had had meningitis as neonates, 109 general practice controls and 191 hospital controls. At 5 years, 39/166 (23%) index children had a serious disability compared to 2% of GP controls and 7% of hospital controls. There was a 16-fold increase in risk of serious disability compared to GP-matched controls and a 4-fold increase in risk compared to hospital controls. The isolation of bacteria from the CSF was the best single predictor of serious long-term disability. Although there was a 70% fall in acute phase mortality between 1985 (22%) and 1996 (6.6%), the overall incidence of serious disability remained alarmingly high, 25.5% in 1985 compared to 23.5% in 1996. In the present study, however, fewer children had cerebral palsy or seizure disorders. Conclusion:Despite the dramatic improvement in acute phase survival following neonatal meningitis, the prevalence of serious sequelae remains alarmingly high.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available