Journal
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 990-996Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.06.005
Keywords
cirrhosis; encephalopathy; pooled hazard ratio; inconsistency index; systematic review
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background/Aims: Meta-analysis designed to provide evidence-based guidance on the effect of TIPS and paracentesis on mortality and encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. Methods: Five randomized trials published between 1989 and 2005 were identified. Results: The five trials involved 330 patients, and none included patients > 76 years, with bilirubin > 5-10 mg/dl or creatinine > 3 mg/dl. Ascites recurrence was lower in the TIPS arm (RR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.47-0.66). TIPS was associated with a greater risk of encephalopathy (RR 1.36; 95% CI 1.1-1.68) and severe encephalopathy (RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.142.58). TIPS did not affect mortality, as estimated by the RR (0.93; 95% CI 0.67-1.28, random effect model) and pooled hazard ratio (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.84-1.88). Analysis of this outcome measure was limited by significant heterogeneity among trials. Liver-related mortality was homogenous and similar in both arms. Results were unaffected by excluding trials of lower quality or with a greater number of alcoholics. Meta-analysis of trials including patients with recidivant ascites revealed a lower mortality in the TIPS arm (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49-0.93). Conclusions: In patients with refractory ascites, a better control of ascites by TIPS does not translate into improved survival and worsens encephalopathy. (c) 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available