4.7 Article

Peroxynitrite causes endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in human vascular endothelium -: Implications in atherogenesis

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 2623-2629

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000189159.96900.d9

Keywords

endothelium; nitric oxide; endoplasmic reticulum; atherosclerosis; calcium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective - Peroxynitrite, a potent oxidant generated by the reaction of NO with superoxide, has been implicated in the promotion of atherosclerosis. We designed this study to determine whether peroxynitrite induces its proatherogenic effects through induction of endoplasmic reticulum ( ER) stress. Methods and Results - Human vascular endothelial cells treated with Sin-1, a peroxynitrite generator, induced the expression of the ER chaperones GRP78 and GRP94 and increased eIF2 alpha phosphorylation. These effects were inhibited by the peroxynitrite scavenger uric acid. Sin-1 caused the depletion of ER-Ca2+, an effect known to induce ER stress, resulting in the elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ and programmed cell death (PCD). Sin-1 treatment was also found, via 3-nitrotyrosine and GRP78 colocalization, to act directly on the ER. Adenoviral-mediated overexpression of GRP78 in endothelial cells prevented Sin-1 - induced PCD. Consistent with these in vitro findings, 3-nitrotyrosine was observed and colocalized with GRP78 in endothelial cells of early atherosclerotic lesions from apolipoprotein E - deficient mice. Conclusions - Peroxynitrite is an ER stress-inducing agent. Its effects include the depletion of ER-Ca2+, a known mechanism of ER stress induction. The observation that 3-nitrotyrosine - containing proteins colocalize with markers of ER stress within early atherosclerotic lesions suggests that peroxynitrite contributes to atherogenesis through a mechanism involving ER stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available