4.6 Review Book Chapter

The Performance of the Endangered Species Act

Journal

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173538

Keywords

critical habitat; expenditures; extinction; listing; recovery plan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arguably the most notable success of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is that listed species improve in status through time. More species are down-listed thin the converse; more species transition from stable to improving status than the converse. Although Sonic listed Species have gone extinct, this number is smaller thin expected. Given modest recovery funding, the fraction of listed species responding positively is remarkable. Several factors have been linked to improving species status including recovery expenditures, critical habitat listing, and time Spent under protection. The inability of government to fully empower the agencies to implement the law has been the most notable failure of the E SA. Listing of species has not marched need, recovery expenditures do not match need or agency-set priorities, and critical habitat determinations have lagged. Alternative protection strategies to listing may be having a positive effect, but are difficult to assess because of sparse data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available