4.7 Article

Circulating levels of active transforming growth factor β1 are reduced in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and correlate inversely with the modified Rodnan skin score

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 1518-1524

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei088

Keywords

scleroderma; systemic sclerosis; biological markers; severity of illness index; transforming growth factor beta

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To determine the relationship between clinical features and circulating levels of active transforming growth factor (TGF) beta 1 in the major subsets of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods. In a cross-sectional study cases of diffuse cutaneous SSc (dose) (n=27) or limited cutaneous SSc (dose) (n=20) were compared with healthy controls (n=22). Active and total TGF beta 1 was measured in serum and plasma by a high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results. There were no significant differences between levels of total serum TGF beta 1. However, cases of dcSSc had lower levels of active TGF beta 1 than cases of lcSSc or controls. In addition, more cases of dcSSc (18/27; 66%, P < 0.025) had no detectable active TGF beta 1 than controls (7/22, 32%) or lcSSc (7/20, 35%). In dcSSc, serum active TGF beta 1 levels correlated negatively with skin score and positively with disease duration. Conclusions. Contrary to expectation, levels of active TGF beta 1 are reduced in dcSSc and this correlates with two variables known to associate with disease activity, shorter duration and more extensive skin sclerosis. This suggests that active TGF beta 1 may be sequestered in active involved SSc skin and that serum levels are reduced despite strong evidence implicating TGF beta isoforms in the pathogenesis of fibrosis. Our findings may have implications for systemic TGF beta-trapping therapies in this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available