4.3 Article

Patients' costs associated with seeking and accessing treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa

Journal

Publisher

INT UNION AGAINST TUBERCULOSIS LUNG DISEASE (I U A T L D)
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0341

Keywords

treatment duration; out-of-pocket expenditure; poverty

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), Seattle, WA, USA
  2. Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF), Paris, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SETTING: South Africa is one of the world's 22 high tuberculosis (TB) burden countries, with the second highest number of notified rifampicin-resistant TB (R-R-TB) and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) cases. OBJECTIVE: To estimate patient costs associated with the diagnosis and treatment of R-R-TB/MDR-TB in South Africa. DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with RR-TB/MDR-TB and accessing care at government health care facilities were surveyed using a structured questionnaire. Direct and indirect costs associated with accessing R-R-TB/MDR-TB care were estimated at different treatment durations for each patient. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were surveyed: 84 in the intensive phase and 50 in the continuation phase of treatment, 82 in-patients and 52 out-patients. The mean monthly patient costs associated with the diagnosis and treatment of R-R-TB/MDR-TB were higher during the intensive phase than the continuation phase (US$235 vs. US$188) and among in-patients than among outpatients (US$269 vs. US$122). Patients in the continuation phase and those accessing care as out-patients reported higher out-of-pocket costs than other patients. Most patients did not access social protection for costs associated with RR-TB/MDR-TB illness. CONCLUSION: Despite free health care, patients bear high costs when accessing diagnosis and treatment services for R-R-TB/MDR-TB; appropriate social protection mechanisms should be provided to assist them in coping with these costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available