4.5 Article

Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) cellulose membrane

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 8-9, Pages 1323-1327

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-005-3574-0

Keywords

Acetobacter xylinum; bio-packaging material; cellulose membrane; colour measurements; oxygen transmission; tensile strength

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial cellulose obtained through fermentation by the Acetobacter xylinum is of superior functional quality in comparison to plant cellulose. Various alkali treatment methods were used to process bio-chemically complex pellicle into a clean cellulose membrane/sheet. The effect of potassium hydroxide, sodium carbonate and potassium carbonate was found to be milder on the final cellulose product in contrast to the widely used sodium hydroxide treatment. These novel treatment methods also caused improvement in the tensile strength of the membranes in comparison to sodium hydroxide. The overall quality of the 0.1 M sodium carbonate- and potassium carbonate-treated cellulose was superior, as the membranes displayed maximum tensile strength and elongation next to the native membrane. The low tensile strength of sodium hydroxide-treated membrane is attributed to its higher swelling characteristics in alkali. Further, the low swelling property of sodium carbonate- and potassium carbonate-treated membranes resulted in their high oxygen transmission rates (low oxygen barrier). Hunter lab colour parameters were determined to assess the effect of different alkali treatments on the colour characteristics of the membranes. Further, based on the high mechanical strength and comparatively low oxygen transmission rates, the processed cellulose membranes may find application as a bio-packaging material for controlled atmosphere packaging, where hydrophilic membranes with high oxygen barrier and water vapour permeation are desirable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available