4.5 Article

Isoproterenol does not enhance Ca-dependent Na/Ca exchange current in intact rabbit ventricular myocytes

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 972-981

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2005.09.005

Keywords

sodium-calcium exchange; cardiac excitation-contraction coupling; protein kinase A; isoproterenol; rabbit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiac Na/Ca exchange (NCX. NCX1.1) is critical in cardiac myocyte Ca regulation, and its altered function contributes to inotropic state, systolic dysfunction in heart failure and arrhythmogenesis. Regulation of NCX is multifaceted, but protein kinase A (PKA) effects on NCX function are controversial. Here, we use three different and complementary approaches to compare NCX function +/- 1 mu M isoproterenol (ISO) in intact rabbit cardiac myocytes (in paired comparisons). First. in field-stimulated intact cells we inferred the cytosolic [Ca] ([Ca](i)) dependence of NCX function from the decay rate of caffeine-induced [Ca](i) transients. Second, we measured caffeine-induced [Ca](i) and inward I-NCX simultaneously (perforated patch voltage clamp). to measure directly the [Ca](i) dependence of NCX rate. Third, using whole cell ruptured patch with [Ca](i) heavily buffered to 100 nM, [Na](i) = 10 mM, and l(Ca), SR Ca release and Na/K pump all blocked, we recorded I-NCX ramps at 37 degrees C. We find that NCX function is not altered by PKA activation under any of these three protocols, where intracellular conditions ranged from near-physiological to highly controlled. This does not rule out NCX modulation by PKA under all conditions, or in species other than rabbit. However, such effects are likely to be either minor (vs. other PKA actions on myocyte Ca handling) or indirect, such as secondary effects dependent on altered local [Ca](i) and [Na](i). (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available