Designatable units for status assessment of endangered species

Species status assessment and the conservation of biological diversity may require defining units below the species level to portray probabilities of extinction accurately and to help set priorities for conservation efforts. What those units should be has been debated in the scientific literature largely in terms of evolutionarily significant units (ESUs), but this discourse has bad little impact on government policy with regard to status assessment. As with species concepts, the variously proposed ESU concept, have not been resolvable into a single approach. The need for a practicable procedure to identify infraspecific entities for status assignment is The motivation behind employing designatable units (DUs). In aid of a policy to prevent elements of biodiversity from becoming extinct or extirpated, DUs arc, determined during the process of resolving a specics' conservation status according to broadly applicable guidelines. The procedure asks whether putative DUs are distinguishable based oil a reliably established taxonomy or a well-corroborated phylogeny compelling evidence of genetic distinction, range disjunction, and/or biogeographic distinction as long as extinction probabilities also differ The language of the DU approach avoids wording that implies value judgments concerning evolutionary importance or significance. Because species conservation status assessment is not science but, rather; the use of science to further policy DUs contribute to a precautionary approach to listing whereby status may, be assessed even though knowledge of systematic relationships below the species level may be lacking or unresolved. The pragmatic approach of using DUs has been adopted by the Committee oil the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada for status assessment of species under the Canadian Species at Risk Act.