4.7 Article

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy - A prospective clinical and electrophysiological study in patients suffering from solid malignancies

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 252, Issue 12, Pages 1459-1464

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-005-0887-8

Keywords

carboplatin plus paclitaxel; peripheral neuropathy; monitoring; incidence; severity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

(CPPN) and to describe its clinical and electrophysiological features. Patients and methods We prospectively studied 21 adult patients scheduled to be treated with 6 courses of cumulative carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) regimens for a non-myeloid malignancy. They were followed-up by neurological examination and electrophysiological study during chemotherapy and 3 months after its discontinuation. The severity of neurotoxicity was assessed by means of a modified peripheral neuropathy (PNP) score. Results Evidence of CPPN was recorded in 14 of the 21 patients (66.6%). The sensory symptoms were present in the lower limbs first and then involved the upper limbs. No statistical significance, concerning the changes from baseline to subsequent mean scores in all motor conduction parameters examined, was revealed. By contrast, comparisons of the mean changes at baseline and each of the follow-up studies showed significant decrease in all sensory action potentials examined. The mean PNP scores for patients that manifested some grade of neurotoxicity were 17.9 +/- 9.8. The follow-up data 3 months after the discontinuation of chemotherapy showed that the CP-induced neuropathy was at least partially reversed. Conclusion CP-induced neuropathy was symmetrical, distal and predominately sensory in character, though minor to moderate motor signs were only evident in severely affected patients. Reversibility of CP-induced neuropathy was partially observed after the suspension of chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available