4.7 Article

Longevity of experimentally buried seed in Vaccinium:: relationship to climate, reproductive factors and natural seed banks

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages 1167-1176

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01034.x

Keywords

clonal plants; genetic implications; models; seed bank; seed longevity; spatio-temporal dispersal; Vaccinium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1 The fleshy fruited species of Vaccinium are known for their spatial dispersal ability but have generally been found to have poor representation in soil seed banks. 2 A buried seed experiment was conducted with 28 species of Vaccinium, in which seed lots were exhumed at intervals for up to 17 years. Mean species seed longevity was 8.65 years. For five species that persisted in soil for 15-17 years, regression indicates survival times of more than 20 years. 3 Climatic factors (particularly annual temperature range in the centre of the species' distribution range) alone accounted for 42% of the variation in seed longevity and reproductive variables for 55%. 4 Models of fruit dispersal speed (rapid/tardy) demonstrated the link between spatial and temporal (seed longevity) dispersal and between spatial dispersal and habitat affinity (open/closed) of a species. The majority (87%) of species belonged to two of the four possible syndromes (rapid fruit dispersal/long-term seed persistence or tardy dispersal/short-term persistence); 84% of the former were open habitat species. 5 Seed bank density is a function of seed potential longevity, seed rain and soil conditions. Regions that support species having greatest potential longevity have the smallest seed banks. Annual temperature range was positively correlated with potential longevity but negatively correlated with actual seed bank densities. 6 Lack of recruitment via seed in Vaccinium species in arctic regions may limit genetic variability in these clonal plants and impede population responses to climate changes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available