4.5 Article

Changes in cerebral blood flow from the acute to the chronic phase of severe head injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 1411-1418

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1411

Keywords

cerebral blood flow; neurological outcome; severe head injury; xenon-CT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the transition from the acute to the chronic phase of severe head injury in order to determine patterns of change in relation to neurological outcome. We measured CBF with stable xenon-enhanced computed tomography (Xe-CT) in 20 consecutive patieints at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks after severe head injury, and analyzed the relation between the pattern of change in CBF and neurological outcome at 6 months after injury. CBF values were significantly lower in the brain-injured patients than in 14 healthy volunteers, except at 3 weeks after injury, when CBF increased in the patients to a value that did not differ significantly from that in the normal volunteers. We therefore focused on the change in CBF at 3 weeks after injury. We separated the 20 brain-injured patients into two subgroups, of which the first (subgroup A) consisted of nine patients whose CBF had returned to normal by week 3 post-injury, while the second (subgroup B) consisted of 11 patients whose CBF was subnormal at week 3 post-injury. CBF was significantly higher in subgroup A than in subgroup B at 2 weeks post-injury (P < 0.05). CBF in subgroup B remained significantly lower than that in subgroup A throughout the study period. At 6 months post-injury, subgroup A had a significantly better neurological outcome than did subgroup B (p < 0.05). We conclude that patients whose CBF returns to normal at 2-3 weeks following severe traumatic brain injury after being abnormally low in the acute phase of injury can be expected to achieve a good neurological outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available