4.1 Article

A prospective evaluation of leflunomide therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 4303-4305

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.10.116

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim. A preliminary observation suggests leflunomide is effective in the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in renal transplant recipients. A prospective evaluation was conducted in renal transplant recipients to study the efficacy of leflunomide in the treatment of CMV disease. Patients and methods. With prior approval and informed consent for therapy and follow-up, 17 consecutive consenting renal transplant recipients with proven CMV disease were treated with leflunomide. CMV disease was defined as a clinical syndrome of fever and/or symptoms of organ involvement, leukopenia, and a positive nested CMV quantitative PCR test at 0.001 mu g/5 mu L template input, with or without histologic evidence of tissue invasion. Leflunomide metabolite concentrations (A77 1726) were monitored. Results. Of the 17 patients, 14 patients were treated for 6 months for CMV disease the first time; the remaining 3 received leflunomide treatment for relapse after ganciclovir treatment, for a year. Seven patients had fever with viremia and no organ involvement, nine had viremia with involvement of gastrointestinal tract, and one had fever with CMV inclusions in the allograft, with no demonstrable viremia. The three patients with relapse treated with leflunomide responded. Overall, 15 patients (88%) clinically responded to leflunomide therapy and with viral clearance from blood and healing of involved organs. The cost of therapy with intravenous ganciclovir (Cymevene, Roche) for 2 weeks was US $721 while that of leflunomide (Cleft, Cipla Ltd) for 6 months was US $64. Conclusion. Leflunomide treatment for CMV disease in renal transplant recipients is effective, simple, and economical.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available