4.6 Article

Inhibition of p38 reduces myocardial infarction injury in the mouse but not pig after ischemia-reperfusion

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01280.2004

Keywords

signaling; kinase; infarction; heart

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-073550] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inhibition of p38 reduces myocardial infarction injury in the mouse but not pig after ischemia-reperfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2747-H2751, 2005. First published September 2, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart. 01280.2004. -The MAPK family member p38 is activated in the heart after ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. However, the cardioprotective vs. proapoptotic effects associated with p38 activation in the heart after I/R injury remain unresolved. Another issue to consider is that the majority of past studies have employed the rodent as a model for assessing p38's role in cardiac injury vs. protection, while the potential regulatory role in a large animal model is even more uncertain. Here we performed a parallel study in the mouse and pig to directly compare the extent of cardiac injury after I/R at baseline or with the selective p38 inhibitor SB-239063. Infusion of SB-239063 5 min before ischemia in the mouse prevented ischemia-induced p38 activation, resulting in a 25% reduction of infarct size compared with vehicle-treated animals (27.9 +/- 2.9% vs. 37.5 +/- 2.7%). In the pig, SB-239063 similarly inhibited myocardial p38 activation, but there was no corresponding effect on the degree of infarction injury (43.6 +/- 4.0% vs. 41.4 +/- 4.3%). These data suggest a difference in myocardial responsiveness to I/R between the small animal mouse model and the large animal pig model, such that p38 activation in the mouse contributes to acute cellular injury and death, while the same activation in pig has no causative effect on these parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available