4.3 Article

Cryopreservation of European catfish Silurus glanis sperm:: Sperm motility, viability, and hatching success of embryos

Journal

CRYOBIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 250-261

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.07.005

Keywords

fish; European catfish Silurus glanis; sperm; aquaculture; cryopreservation; sperm motility; velocity; fertility; cryobank; immobilizing medium; reproduction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to elaborate cryopreservation methods for ex situ conservation of European catfish. The success of sperm cryopreservation was evaluated by post-thaw sperm motility and velocity, percentage of live spermatozoa and fertility (hatching rates) using frozen/thawed sperm. The best hatching rates of 82-86% were obtained with sperm stored for 5 h before freezing in immobilizing solution and frozen with Me2SO in concentrations of 8, 10, and 12%, or with a mixture of 5% Me2SO and 5% propandiole. These results did not significantly differ from the fresh sperm control sample. The percentage of live spermatozoa in frozen/thawed sperm did not correlate with hatching rate or motility of spermatozoa, but was negatively correlated with velocity of spermatozoa (r = -0.47, P = 0.05). The percentage motility in frozen/thawed sperm ranged from 8 to 62%, when sperm was stored in immobilizing solution 5 h before freezing. The average value in the fresh sperm (control) was 96%. The frozen/thawed sperm motility rate significantly correlated with the hatching rate (r = 0.76, P = 0.0002), but not with the percentage of live spermatozoa (r = 0.16, P = 0.52) or the sperm velocity (r = 0.07, P = 0.79). The velocity of frozen/thawed spermatozoa ranged from 37 to 85 mu m/s, whereby methanol concentrations of 7.5 and 10% resulted in highest velocities. Freezing sperm volumes of 1-4 ml did not affect the quality of frozen/thawed sperm. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available