4.3 Article

Diplostomum (Austrodiplostomum) compactum (Lutz, 1928) (Platyhelminthes, Digenea) metacercariae in fish from the floodplain of the Upper Parana River, Brazil

Journal

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages 436-444

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-005-1483-7

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diplostomum (Austrodiplostomum) compactum (Lutz, 1928) metacercariae (Platyhelminthes, Digenea) were found in six fish species, belonging to two orders (Characiformes and Perciformes) and three families (Erythrinidae, Sciaenidae and Cichlidae). A total of 477 individuals were collected, from August 1999 to May 2001, in the upper Parana River floodplain, Brazil. The metacercariae were infecting the eyes of six host species and the brain of five of them. Plagioscion squamosissimus, Satanoperca pappaterra and Cichla monoculus presented the highest values of prevalence, mean intensity and mean abundance. Diplostomum (A.) compactum was overdispersed in the population of Hoplias aff. malabaricus, S. pappaterra, P. squamosissimus, Crenicichla britskii and C. monoculus. No significant difference was observed in the metacercariae distribution in the right and left eyes. The abundance of D. (A.) compactum metacercariae was positively correlated with the host's relative condition factor in H. aff. malabaricus and S. pappaterra. No significant difference of the abundance of parasitism between the sex of the hosts was evidenced. In relation to the prevalence, significant difference was observed only in C. britskii. Positive correlations were verified between the prevalence of infection and the standard length of the specimens in C. britskii and the intensity of infection and the standard length of the hosts in P. squamosissimus and C. monoculus. In relation to parasite abundance and the standard length class of the host, significant differences were observed in P. squamosissimus, C. britskii and C. monoculus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available