4.7 Article

Malnutrition determined by the patient-gene rated subjective global assessment is associated with poor outcomes in acute stroke patients

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1073-1077

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.08.010

Keywords

malnutrition; stroke; outcomes; nutrition status; scored PG-SGA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Et aims: The extent of malnutrition in hospitalised stroke patients and its influence on outcomes including hospital complications, length of stay and discharge destination are important issues. The aim of this study was to determine the nutritional status of patients admitted to an acute stroke unit and the association between nutritional status and health outcomes. Methods: Nutritional status was determined prospectively using the scored patient generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) in patients In = 73) admitted to an acute stroke unit within 48 h of admission to an Australian private hospital. Outcome data were collected by retrospective audit. Results: On admission, 19.2% of patients were malnourished and this was associated with a significantly greater PG-SGA score (15 vs. 5) and tower body weight (59.8 kg vs. 75.8 kg) compared to well-nourished patients. In terms of health outcomes, malnourished patients had longer length of stay (13 vs. 8 days), increased complications (50% vs. 14%), increased frequency of dysphagia (71% vs. 32%) and enteral feeding (93% vs. 59%). No association was found between nutritional status and serum albumin level or discharge destination. Conclusions: Malnutrition on admission to hospital after acute stroke is associated with poor outcomes including increased length of stay and increased prevalence of dysphagia and complications. The scored PG-SGA is a nutrition assessment toot that allows quick identification of malnourished stroke patients. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available