4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Molecular evaluation of BK polyomavirus nephropathy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages 2883-2893

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01096.x

Keywords

fibrosis; inflammation; kidney; polyomavirus; rejection; transplant

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding at a molecular level, the immunologic response of polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN), a critical cause of kidney graft loss, could lead to new targets for treatment and diagnosis. We undertook a transcriptional evaluation of kidney allograft biopsies from recipients with PVN or acute rejection (AR), as well as from recipients with stable allograft function (SF). In both the PVN and AR groups, Banff histologic scores and immunohistochemical analysis of inflammatory infiltrates were similar. Despite their different etiologies, the transcriptional profiles of PVN and AR were remarkably similar. However, transcription of genes previously linked to AR including CD8 (65.9 +/- 18.8) and related molecules IFN-gamma(55.1 +/- 17.0), CXCR3 (49.9 +/- 12.8) and perforin (153.8 +/- 50.4) were significantly higher in PVN compared to AR (30.9 +/- 2.0, 14.0 +/- 7.3, 12.1 +/- 7.3 and 15.6 +/- 3.8-fold, respectively; p < 0.01). Importantly, transcription of molecules associated with graft fibrosis including matrix collagens, TGF beta, MMP2 and 9, as well as markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) were significantly higher in PVN than AR. Thus, renal allografts with PVN transcribe proinflammatory genes equal in character and larger in magnitude to that seen during acute cellular rejection. BK infection creates a transcriptional microenvironment that promotes graft fibrosis. These findings provide new insights into the intrarenal inflammation of BK infection that promotes graft loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available