4.5 Article

Computations of particle surface characteristics using optical and X-ray CT images

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 406-424

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.01.010

Keywords

angularity; computation; form; Imaging; particle; powder; shape; spherical harmonics; texture; X-ray computed tomography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The description of particle surface characteristics is of interest in many disciplines in science and engineering such as powder technology, geology, soil science, and infrastructure materials. Consequently, there is a need to develop methods to quantify particle surface characteristics rapidly and accurately. In this study, a number of computational methods were utilized to describe the surface characteristics (form, angularity and texture) of three different granular materials. These computational methods are the radius method, gradient method, form index, Fourier series, spherical harmonic series, and sphericity index. To illustrate the validity of these methods, they were first used to analyze the shape of standard images that were used in the past by geologists for visual classification of particles. Subsequently, the methods were used to analyze images captured using nondestructive X-ray computed tomography (CT), and an automated computer controlled system known. as the Aggregate Imaging System (AIMS). The results demonstrated the capabilities of the analysis methods to quantify the multi-scale nature of form, angularity, and texture. In general, the images captured using AIMS can be used to develop a particle shape classification system, while the X-ray CT images, in conjunction with spherical harmonic analysis, a powerful technique to represent and reconstruct three-dimensional images of particles, can be used to mathematically represent the shape of particles in computational models. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available